Archive for June, 2005

Moon Colonization Japanese Style

Another quick story I read today that really caught my attention. Remember back a while ago when the US President announced that we would land a man on the Moon by a certain time? Well Japan just did that today, except replace “land” with “colonize” and “man” with “robots”. The head of the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency has set a goal to have a colony of humaniod robots on the moon by the year 2025.

With the rapid progress of companies like Honda and Sony with their robotic development programs I don’t doubt that this will actually happen, given that they find the funds to do it with. However, I hope they go prepared to deal with the Mooninites when they get there. No one, not even Sony’s favorite robotic dog, can escape the Quad-Laser…

Via Engadget

Tags:

14″ Widescreen iBook In The Works

Engadget is reporting that Asustek (who currently produces the 12″ iBook and 12″ Powerbook is going to be producing a new 14″ widescreen iBook. Speculation abounds whether this will be Apple’s foray into Intel powered hardware, or one of the last laptops built for the PowerPC line of processors. Either way, this model will surely hold a special place in at least half of the community’s heart (depending on what side of the fence you’re on regarding the hardware change).

Regardless of that, I’m wondering if the new aspect ratio is going to carry with it a higher resolution display. My Powerbook’s DPI is looking pretty dinky next to the new Sony screens!

Via: Engadget

Cell Phones At Home

I remember seeing a few months ago that Motorola had released a cell phone dock that allowed you to integrate your cell phone into your home’s phone system. So you would get home, set your cell in the cradle, and any incoming calls would be routed to any phone hooked into your home’s system. While it was certainly cool, it was restricted to a few select Motorola phone models.

I hadn’t kept up with the idea, and today I was surprised to see that the idea has made it to the mainstream while walking through Circuit City. I saw one model that physically plugged into your cell phone (I can’t remember the brand/model). To accommodate different cell phones the company sold different connection modules, much like buying a universal power supply and then buying the appropriate power tip for your device. While this was a logical approach to the phone compatibility problem, I hold reservations about finding new “modules” as you upgrade your phone, and once the base station is no longer manufactured.

Uniden approached the problem with, what I think, is a much more graceful solution. The base unit for their “ELBT” product has Bluetooth built in. Instead of using a plug to connect to your cell phone, the Unident ELBT uses the hands-free Bluetooth profile. As long as Bluetooth is a supported standard in cell phones (which I hope will be for a while) any new phone you buy should work with the Uniden base station… all without the need to buy a new plug.

Uniden really went all out with the Bluetooth angle though. The handset for the ELBT resembles a cell phone itself, with a clamshell form factor, a large color LCD screen, and Bluetooth that supports connecting to a BT headset. Initially, this seemed a bit pointless to me. If you wanted a phone with a cell phone form factor, and cell phone features (such as the color picture caller ID the handset supports)… then why not skip the base station all together and just carry your cell phone around your house? Thankfully there are a couple other Uniden handsets that you can purchase that will add-on to the cordless base station, so you can get something that more closely resembles a traditional home phone, and looks much less like your cell phone. [tangent]As I looked at all of the cordless phones at the store, I’ve reached the conclusion that cell phones are really hurting cordless phone manufacturers, and they are doing all they can to incorporate cell phone-like features… which seems like the wrong approach to take. Don’t mimic cell phones… offer features that are unique that only a home-phone could do.[/tanget]

As I stood there playing with the product I attempted to identify with a person who may find this system useful. I’m still struggling with this. My first thought is that a family may like to drop the land-line and use a cell connection throughout the whole house. However, I shudder at the idea of being a teenager who has to give my friends my father’s cell phone number to call me. There’s also the fact that when the owner of the cell phone leaves the house, the rest of the family is left without access. Well then this product must be for individuals living alone right? Well then I come back to the fact that you could just carry your cell phone around the house with you. As I thought about it more, I realized that I could actually use a system like this! My cell phone hardly pics up in my house, but gets decent reception in a couple spots. A system like this would let me set my cell phone in a place where it gets optimal reception, and the handset would provide me the freedom to move around the house while making calls.

So that’s the best reason I can come up with to get one of these systems, and I can’t imagine there being a large segment of the population that shares my dilemma. So far I think the product is riding the cool factor of running a cell phone through a home phone system. If you can think of any other situations where a system like this would be useful please feel free to leave a comment!

Tags:

Let’s Get Things Straight…

After today’s announcement from Apple I’ve seen a lot of people freaking out without really sitting down and understanding what’s happening. I just want to share how I perceive the situation.

The fact that Apple is switching to Intel CPUs does not mean that you will be able to stick a Tiger install DVD in your Dell and accomplish anything productive. Apple has already stated that they do not intend on letting their OS run on non-Apple hardware. There will certainly be hacking projects to accomplish this (something like PearPC will become much more of a possibility) but this will never be possible out of the box. Likewise, you won’t be able to order parts from Newegg and build a custom Mac. Apple will be putting Intel CPUs on Apple motherboards that have Apple chipsets that are wrapped in Apple cases.

To most end-users, this announcement really means one thing: Macintosh computers will be getting faster… faster. IBM hasn’t invested much effort into getting the PowerPC line of processors to do what Apple wants because Apple only accounts for a very small part of its business. However, Intel’s whole livelihood depends on developing fast CPUs that produce very little heat while using very little power. People have been demanding a G5 Powerbook for a long time, but it never has been (and never will be) possible. Intel, however, has put tons of money behind the Pentium M line of processors… which will compliment the Powerbook line of computers perfectly. In the PowerMac line, I expect Apple will be making use of Intel’s new Pentium D CPU, a 64-bit dual core processor. Imagine a PowerMac with DUAL Pentium D’s!

Apple’s switch from IBM to Intel isn’t about lowering prices, or taking on Windows on its own hardware… it is about giving the Macintosh line of computers a roadmap for growth. This isn’t about putting OSX on off-the-shelf hardware, but is about replacing a few components in Apple’s own hardware system that will allow for the ability to increase computing speed as the advancements are made. There may be some nice benefits such as better emulation of Windows, but essentially this announcement is no different to the end-user than if Apple had announced that IBM had provided them a new 3.0gighz+ CPU. There will be a transitional period, but Apple has shown software that I expect will make the transition easy enough. (I expect even easier than Palm’s transition from Dragonball processors to ARM)

Tags:

Apple Makes ‘The Switch’

Head over to Engadget for live coverage. Jobs has just announced a switch to Intel that will be complete in 2007.